What is TinyFish?
TinyFish is an enterprise AI web agent platform that executes natural language goals as real browser sessions — navigating websites, authenticating, extracting structured data, and completing multi-step workflows across dynamic sites that traditional scrapers break on. The Palo Alto company has raised $47 million in funding with clients including Google, DoorDash, Amazon, and ClassPass, and in 2026 launched a unified infrastructure layer that provides Search, Fetch, Browser, and Agent capabilities under one API key and one credit pool. The platform achieves web browser cold starts in under 250 milliseconds — compared to a 5-to-10-second industry standard — and reduces web search latency to 488 milliseconds via a custom Chromium engine, with anti-bot mechanisms implemented at the C++ level to avoid common detection risks associated with JavaScript injection. Plans range from a free 500-step tier for testing, to Starter at $15 per month with 1,650 steps and 10 concurrent agents, to Pro at $150 per month with 16,500 steps and 50 concurrent agents, with all LLM inference costs, residential proxy costs, and anti-bot protection bundled into each plan price. TinyFish Workbench, API, and MCP access are included on all paid tiers. TinyFish is purpose-built for developers, operations teams, and enterprise workflows that require reliable, repeated extraction from authenticated or anti-bot-protected sites. It is not optimized for users who need occasional one-off data collection from simple static pages, where a lightweight Scrapy setup or a manual export is faster and cheaper at that low frequency.
TinyFish is an enterprise AI web agent platform backed by $47M in funding, with plans from a 500-step free tier to $15 per month Starter and $150 per month Pro.
TinyFish is widely used by professionals, developers, marketers, and creators to enhance their daily work and improve efficiency.
Key Features
Pros & Cons
Who Uses TinyFish?
TinyFish vs Lutra AI vs Convergence vs Illumex
Detailed side-by-side comparison of TinyFish with Lutra AI, Convergence, Illumex — pricing, features, pros & cons, and expert verdict.
| Compare | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Pricing |
Paid | Freemium | Free | unknown |
Rating |
— | — | — | — |
Free Trial |
✕ | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
Key Features |
|
|
|
|
Pros |
The unified session identity, C++ anti-bot layer, and s With 10 to 50 concurrent agents on paid plans and a cre Screenshot capture, streaming event logs, 30-to-180-day | Describing a workflow in plain English and having it ex Data extraction and enrichment tasks that take an analy Pre-built connections to Airtable, Slack, HubSpot, Goog | Proxy handles the full execution of delegated tasks aut At $20 per month for the Pro tier, Convergence provides Natural language task setup removes the technical barri | Illumex's live duplication detection and semantic asset By maintaining a single, semantically consistent defini The platform's semantic layer grows more contextually a |
Cons |
The API, MCP integration, concurrent agent configuratio TinyFish explicitly states that CAPTCHAs cannot current While API and MCP connectivity are well-documented, Tin | Users new to automation concepts may initially write in Workflows connecting to tools outside Lutra's pre-integ | Users unfamiliar with AI agent delegation often underus The free plan caps the number of Proxy sessions and aut Proxy's ability to execute web-based tasks is entirely | Data contributors unfamiliar with semantic data platfor Illumex's enterprise positioning places it at a price p Illumex's semantic integration layer maps relationships |
Best For |
E-commerce and retail teams | E-commerce Businesses | Busy Professionals | Financial Institutions |
Verdict |
Compared to self-hosted Scrapy infrastructure that requires … | For digital marketing agencies and financial analysts runnin… | For busy professionals managing high volumes of repetitive o… | For telecommunications companies and financial institutions … |
Try It |
Visit TinyFish ↗ | Visit Lutra AI ↗ | Visit Convergence ↗ | Visit Illumex ↗ |
TinyFish vs Lutra AI vs Convergence vs Illumex — Which is Better in 2026?
Choosing between TinyFish, Lutra AI, Convergence, Illumex can be difficult. We compared these tools side-by-side on pricing, features, ease of use, and real user feedback.
TinyFish vs Lutra AI
TinyFish — TinyFish is an AI Agent platform that turns plain-English goals into authenticated browser sessions capable of navigating dynamic websites, filling forms, and e
Lutra AI — Lutra AI is an AI Agent that executes multi-step data workflows autonomously based on natural language input, with pre-built connections to Airtable, Slack, Goo
- TinyFish: Best for E-commerce and retail teams, Travel and hospitality businesses, Sales and lead generation teams, Dev
- Lutra AI: Best for E-commerce Businesses, Digital Marketing Agencies, Research Institutions, Financial Analysts, Uncomm
TinyFish vs Convergence
TinyFish — TinyFish is an AI Agent platform that turns plain-English goals into authenticated browser sessions capable of navigating dynamic websites, filling forms, and e
Convergence — Convergence is an AI Agent that autonomously handles repetitive online tasks — browsing, form-filling, data aggregation, and scheduled workflows — through its n
- TinyFish: Best for E-commerce and retail teams, Travel and hospitality businesses, Sales and lead generation teams, Dev
- Convergence: Best for Busy Professionals, Managers, Researchers, Developers, Uncommon Use Cases
TinyFish vs Illumex
TinyFish — TinyFish is an AI Agent platform that turns plain-English goals into authenticated browser sessions capable of navigating dynamic websites, filling forms, and e
Illumex — Illumex is an AI Tool that applies semantic intelligence to enterprise data management, automating metric documentation and preventing the analytical duplicatio
- TinyFish: Best for E-commerce and retail teams, Travel and hospitality businesses, Sales and lead generation teams, Dev
- Illumex: Best for Financial Institutions, Healthcare Providers, Retail Chains, Telecommunications Companies, Uncommon
Final Verdict
Compared to self-hosted Scrapy infrastructure that requires five to ten hours per week of engineering maintenance at roughly $52,000 annually in loaded labor cost, TinyFish at $15 to $150 per month delivers comparable or superior accuracy on dynamic and authenticated sites with far less maintenance burden — particularly for teams monitoring multiple sources that change layout quarterly. The primary limitation is that CAPTCHA-solving is not currently automated, which creates a manual fallback step for the subset of target sites using image-based or interactive CAPTCHA challenges.
Expert Verdict
Summary
TinyFish is an AI Agent platform that turns plain-English goals into authenticated browser sessions capable of navigating dynamic websites, filling forms, and extracting structured data at scale. Backed by $47 million in funding, it serves enterprise clients like Google and DoorDash, and provides Search, Fetch, Browser, and Agent capabilities under a single API key with pricing from a free 500-step test tier to $150 per month for 50 concurrent agents. All LLM, proxy, and anti-bot costs are included in plan prices.
It is suitable for beginners as well as professionals who want to streamline their workflow and save time using advanced AI capabilities.
User Reviews
0 reviewsAlternatives to TinyFish
6 tools
